RESUMEN
Objective: To improve susceptibility profiles of nosocomial bacteria, identifying the difference between infectious complications in patients undergoing endoscopic flexible ureterolithotomy (fURS) with negative urine culture (UC) that received extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EP) compared with standard antibiotic prophylaxis (SP). Methodology: This is a retrospective, observational, analytical cohort study, comparing infectious complications between patients undergoing fURS with negative UC who received EP versus SP. We include patients with susccessfull fURS, <20-mm stones and complete information. Results: Overall, 10.3% of patients had complications, 7.2% of patients had postoperative urinary infection, 1.8% had upper urinary tract infection (UTI) and 1.4% had urinary sepsis. Lower UTI were significantly more likely in the extended prophylaxis group with 6.8% versus 2.7% (RR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.10-7.37, p = 0.030). The risk of upper UTI and sepsis did not show significant differences. A total of 69% patients with postoperative infection had isolated multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) in the UC, with a higher risk in patients with extended prophylaxis (RR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.33-7.59, p = 0.009). Conclusions: Patients with negative UC who underwent fURS using extended prophylaxis have two times higher risk of low UTI than patients with standard prophylaxis, without differences in the incidence of upper UTI or urinary sepsis. The risk of MDRB isolation in the postoperative UC is higher in the extended prophylaxis group, therefore we recommend the standard 60-min preoperative prophylaxis.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Introduction: Urinary tract injuries are common in the context of pelvic surgery; however, there is little information in the medical literature on the management of these injuries using a laparoscopic approach. The following is the clinical case of a patient with intraperitoneal bladder injury secondary to gynecological pelvic surgery that was successfully treated using a laparoscopic approach. Moreover, a management algorithm is proposed based on the scientific data available. Case report. A 39-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital with generalized abdominal pain and anuria three days after undergoing a left laparoscopic salpingectomy and resection of a migrated intrauterine device. Laboratory tests showed microhematuria, serum creatinine of 4.35mg/dL, and urea nitrogen of 35.2mg/dL. Computed tomography cystography showed a solution of continuity on the left posterolateral intraperitoneal bladder. The patient underwent successful laparoscopic treatment for the bladder injury, and two weeks later, retrograde cystography confirmed its adequate resolution. Conclusions. Based on the benefits of the laparoscopic approach and after extrapolating the outcomes of the laparoscopic management of bladder trauma, it can be concluded that the laparoscopic approach to surgical injuries of the bladder is a feasible therapeutic option.
RESUMEN Introducción. Las lesiones del tracto urinario son frecuentes en el contexto de la cirugía pélvica; sin embargo, existe poca información sobre su manejo por vía laparoscópica. Se presenta el caso de una paciente con una lesión vesical intraperitoneal secundaria a cirugía pélvica ginecológica, quien recibió manejo por abordaje laparoscópico, y se propone un algoritmo de tratamiento. Presentación del caso. Mujer de 39 años quién, luego de tres días de practicársele una salpingectomía izquierda y una resección del dispositivo intrauterino migrado mediante abordaje laparoscópico, consultó al servicio de urgencias por dolor abdominal generalizado y oligoanuria. Los exámenes de laboratorio evidenciaron microhematuria, creatinina sérica de 4.35mg/dl y nitrógeno ureico de 35,2mg/dl. En cistografía por tomografía computarizada (cisto-TC) se observó una solución de continuidad de la pared vesical posterolateral izquierda intraperitoneal. A la paciente se le trató la lesión vesical de forma exitosa por vía laparoscópica, y dos semanas después, también mediante cistografía retrógrada se confirmó una adecuada resolución de la misma. Conclusión. Dados los resultados satisfactorios del manejo laparoscópico en la paciente y los beneficios de esta técnica, se puede concluir que el abordaje laparoscópico de las lesiones quirúrgicas de la vejiga es una opción terapéutica factible.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Introduction: Metanephric adenoma is a rare benign kidney tumor. Patients with these tumors are usually asymptomatic, although polycythemia occurs in up 12% of cases. These masses are often described on diagnostic imaging as solid, single, well-defined, oval-shaped, unilateral lesions, located primarily in the renal medulla and without extrarenal involvement. These neoplasms are difficult to differentiate from malignant neoplasms of the upper urinary tract, so the definitive diagnosis is achieved by histopathology. Currently, the treatment of choice is radical nephrectomy. Case presentation: A 51-year-old woman from Bogotá (Colombia) was referred to the urology service of a tertiary care hospital due to bilateral lumbar pain of non-specific characteristics. At the time of consultation, the patient was asymptomatic. Renal and urinary tract ultrasound showed hydronephrosis and right renal mass. Computed tomography urography was requested, which revealed a lesion in the right renal pelvis with parenchymal invasion highly suggestive of high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, as well as adenopathies in the para-aortic lymph nodes. The patient underwent a radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff, which allowed establishing a final diagnosis of metanephric adenoma according to the histopathological study. Conclusions: Metanephric adenoma is a rare tumor that is difficult to diagnose through imaging, so it is necessary to explore additional tools to establish an accurate pre-surgical diagnosis that allows preserving the affected renal unit. Also, given their non-specificity, these tumors should be included in the differential diagnosis of lesions suggestive of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
RESUMEN Introducción. El adenoma metanéfrico es un tumor renal benigno poco frecuente. Los pacientes con estos tumores no suelen presentar síntomas, aunque en el 12% de los casos se presenta policitemia. En las imágenes diagnósticas, los adenomas metanéfricos se observan como lesiones sólidas, únicas y bien definidas que, por lo general, comprometen la medula renal pero no ocasionan compromiso extrarenal. Estas neoplasias son difíciles de diferenciar imagenológicamente de neoplasias malignas del tracto urinario superior, por lo que el diagnóstico definitivo se logra mediante estudios histopatológicos. El tratamiento de elección es la nefrectomía radical. Presentación del caso. Mujer de 51 años procedente de Bogotá (Colombia), quien fue remitida al servicio de urología de un hospital de tercer nivel de atención por dolor lumbar bilateral de características inespecíficas. Al momento de la consulta la paciente se encontraba asintomática. Mediante ecografía renal y de vías urinarias se evidenció hidronefrosis y una masa renal derecha. Se ordenó urografía por tomografía axial computarizada que documentó una lesión en la pelvis renal derecha con invasión al parénquima renal altamente sugestiva de carcinoma urotelial de tracto urinario superior de alto riesgo, así como adenopatías en los ganglios paraaórticos, por lo que se le realizó una nefroureterectomía radical derecha con cuña vesical que permitió establecer un diagnóstico final de adenoma metanéfrico según el estudio histopatoló-gico. La paciente tuvo una evolución satisfactoria. Conclusiones. El adenoma metanéfrico es un tumor poco frecuente y de difícil diagnóstico imagenológico, por lo que se requiere explorar herramientas adicionales para establecer un diagnóstico certero prequirúrgico que permita preservar la unidad renal afectada. Asimismo, dada su inespecificidad, estos tumores deben incluirse dentro de los diagnósticos diferenciales de las lesiones sugestivas de carcinoma urotelial de tracto urinario superior.
